Late last year, Slate published a story about the way
Facebook was sorting users emails. Facebook’s argument was that to help
personalize messages they would filter important messages into one place and
unimportant messages into another. How did they decide what’s important?
Algorithms.
Algorithms are a series
of if-then scenarios. These algorithms ask “if” questions about data from your
Facebook account and make “then” decisions based on the “if.” For example, “if”
the sender as a friend of a friend, “then” her message will show up in your
standard message folder. If not, then it goes into a secondary folder. Things
like that.
The rationale behind the
algorithm makes sense on some level. Maybe you don’t want strangers emailing
you. That’s called spam. But the point isn’t whether the decision is good or
bad, right or wrong. The point is who made the decision? You or an algorithm?
Outsourcing decisions is
the purpose of most technology. It makes decisions for you—mainly by deciding how the work gets done. Technology
determines procedure. Technology is, in fact, a bundle of decisions and
procedures. Technology can’t not
function this way. If it did, then it wouldn’t be technology. (How’s that for
an if-then scenario?) Our job is to see these bundles for what they are, to
understand these decisions and procedures.
Algorithms don't decide
strictly either-or matters though. Algorithms can also prioritize
information—just like those Facebook messages. Consider another example. Search
results are personalized based on algorithms. Search engines like Netflix look
at your search history, ask if-then questions, and make suggestions based on
the algorithm’s results. By tracking and aggregating the data we as users give
them, they even predict how many stars you will give it. Behind this is the
decision that your past movies searches indicate what you’re likely to want.
The algorithm assumes that individuals tend to be monolithic. Do you feel
monolithic? I find individuals to be surprisingly varied in their interests.
But search engines display results based on these simplifications about human
nature.
Technology’s priorities
aren’t limited to high-tech algorithms on the Internet though. Out my window,
I’m watching cars speed by. I have to look both ways before crossing that
street. Why? Because streets are for cars, not for people. This wasn’t always
the case. A hundred years ago, if you had asked people what a street was for,
you would have had multiple answers. Today, streets are exclusively the car’s
rightful domain. People and “street vendors” are relegated to sidewalks. Cars
have priority, but why?
One reason is safety. We
don’t want people to be hit by speeding cars. This makes sense. But behind this
is the assumption that cars should go fast enough to kill people. Well, that’s
not how we say it, but that’s part of the truth. We want to be able to drive
cars fast so that we can get there sooner. We want to save time.
Saving time is the
bottom line with all technology. Our decisions and procedures are aimed at that
single goal. Personalize search results help you find what your looking for
faster. Car-only streets clear the way for uninhibited travel. Even street
lights serve this purpose, which you quickly realize when the power goes out
and it turns into a right-of-way intersection. All technology helps us get
things done faster. Efficiency is the end of all technology. We want to save
time so that we can spend it elsewhere.
Of course, there are
other intermediate reasons that technology has. Orbitz recently acknowledged
that its search results vary depending on whether your using a Mac or a PC. How
do the results differ? Well, by tracking and aggregating the data we as users
give them, Orbitz has determined that Mac users are more willing to spend more
for a nicer hotel. So Orbitz shows them higher-priced options first. Not for
the same hotels or the same flights, but for nicer ones. Mac users can still
find the same low-price deals; those just aren’t the first results to come up.
It’s an algorithm thing. If you have a Mac, then you might be willing to pay
more for a nicer hotel.
Yes, you still can find
and choose the cheaper prices, but your technology is deciding which options
you see first. Now we can chalk this story up to a greedy corporate board, but
it’s just an algorithm responding to some data, right? Well, no, not exactly.
Someone’s deciding, but it’s not you.
I think my greatest concerns have to do with privacy issues. Passive algorithms calculated with cpu power seem relatively harmless, as might even certain tracking technology (e.g., cookies which are at least stored locally). But I wouldn't be surprised if some information is recorded 'out there' (i.e., not on my computer).
ReplyDelete